<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems Identifying Domain Characters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/2007/10/13/problems-identifying-domain-characters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/2007/10/13/problems-identifying-domain-characters/</link>
	<description>Yet another blog of an opinionated person.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/2007/10/13/problems-identifying-domain-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 13:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/?p=19#comment-153</guid>
		<description>The problem is now sorted. It in fact only had a problem if a 0 was in the domain and did not recognise it as a number.

It looks like PHP's loose type casting caused the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is now sorted. It in fact only had a problem if a 0 was in the domain and did not recognise it as a number.</p>
<p>It looks like PHP&#8217;s loose type casting caused the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/2007/10/13/problems-identifying-domain-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/?p=19#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Hi Patrick

I agree these sort of tactics are immoral and deceitful. Unfortunately places such as eBay are too willing to allow it to continue.

I will look at why the script is not working properly. I have just tried it and you are indeed correct. Looks like there are some other breaks in it as well possibly caused by the upgrade in PHP I recently carried out. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patrick</p>
<p>I agree these sort of tactics are immoral and deceitful. Unfortunately places such as eBay are too willing to allow it to continue.</p>
<p>I will look at why the script is not working properly. I have just tried it and you are indeed correct. Looks like there are some other breaks in it as well possibly caused by the upgrade in PHP I recently carried out. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/2007/10/13/problems-identifying-domain-characters/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.petermcdonald.co.uk/?p=19#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hi,

A while back someone was selling the domain VOIP.info.

I contacted the seller to make sure that it was really all 4 letters and really the acronym VOIP.

His reply was that he wishes it were but that the o was really a 0.

In the title and body copy he used the letter o.

He never used a 0 or mentioned that the o was a 0.

Scum!

I tried your script just now using V0IP.com.

It did not recognize the 0 as a number.

All results were green.

Another common scam is to use  the letter V twice to make it look like a W.

VV or W.

With some fonts it's hard to tell the difference.

The same with using the letter lower case letter l (eye) for Capital  I (el).

They look identical.

Is there anyway your tool could uncover that type of deception?

Thanks.
Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>A while back someone was selling the domain VOIP.info.</p>
<p>I contacted the seller to make sure that it was really all 4 letters and really the acronym VOIP.</p>
<p>His reply was that he wishes it were but that the o was really a 0.</p>
<p>In the title and body copy he used the letter o.</p>
<p>He never used a 0 or mentioned that the o was a 0.</p>
<p>Scum!</p>
<p>I tried your script just now using V0IP.com.</p>
<p>It did not recognize the 0 as a number.</p>
<p>All results were green.</p>
<p>Another common scam is to use  the letter V twice to make it look like a W.</p>
<p>VV or W.</p>
<p>With some fonts it&#8217;s hard to tell the difference.</p>
<p>The same with using the letter lower case letter l (eye) for Capital  I (el).</p>
<p>They look identical.</p>
<p>Is there anyway your tool could uncover that type of deception?</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
